Enough for a parent to act on. Not enough to make them a spy.
I designed an AI product that helps parents understand their kids' online lives while resisting the easy, invasive version of that idea.
- Role
- Design Consultant
- Scope
- Product · Brand · Research
- Team
- Founders + CTO
- Focus
- AI · Research · 0→1
monitoring
per day
01 — THE SETUP
Parents wanted context. They did not need another stream of content to police.
BrightCanary helps parents understand what is happening in their kids' digital lives. I worked as the sole designer with the founders and CTO across product, UX, brand, AI, research, and paywall.
Research moved the product toward private messaging, and iMessage became the core experience.
That made the value much clearer. It also raised the privacy stakes immediately.
messages→AI
summary→Useful
context→Parent
action
02 — THE CHALLENGE
Too shallow was useless. Too detailed turned the parent into the monitor.
Summarize enough to support a conversation. Add friction before revealing the thread.
If summaries were vague, parents still had to read everything. If they were exhaustive, the product became surveillance with better typography.
We kept raw threads behind a confirmation that named the privacy consequence. The extra step was intentional, even though removing it might have increased engagement.
03 — WHAT I DID
AI can label a pattern. Parents still need context.
- Designed emotion analysis with a real framework.Structured five primary emotions with three secondary states each, plus APA-informed categories and 24-hour curves, so the experience had more grounding than a happy/sad label.
- Explained the language around the signal.Added slang explanations and context so parents could understand what a phrase meant without pretending the model understood the whole relationship.
- Designed an early LLM assistant.Created Canary in 2023 as a guardrailed assistant for questions, summaries, and possible next steps.
- Tested onboarding instead of assuming shorter was better.Marketing proposed eight questions. I expected fewer to win. The eight-question version converted better, improved engagement, and gave us useful segmentation.
04 — WHAT HAPPENED
The private-message use case became the product people came back for.
70%Of users adopted iMessage monitoring
3–4Sessions per day
8–10 min.Average session length
<2%Churn
TESTIMONIAL PLACEHOLDERBrightCanary founder or CTO quote
Best quote: privacy judgment, product range, or translating sensitive AI behavior into something families could use.
05 — LOOKING BACK
The restraint was part of the product.
We could have made private information easier to open and harder to stop reading.
We chose to help parents know when to have a conversation instead.